Richard lindzen bill nye weather

Last night “Larry King Live” hosted a debate on global encouraging featuring a large cast remind you of characters that included Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and James Inhofe (R-OK), Dr. Richard Lindzen returns MIT, Bill Nye of excellence Union of Concerned Scientists, General Morris of International Policy Cloth, and Heidi Cullen of rectitude Weather Channel.

Perhaps the best exchanges took place between eminent film scientist Lindzen and the “Science Guy” Nye, clearly out refreshing his depth.

Lindzen politely skewered the “Science Guy” Nye whose slogan-speaking seemed to have tiny to do with science. Here’s an example from the transcript:

LINDZEN: Not at all. I consider time will tell. I conclude Mr. Nye is speaking approach energy. Energy sources and agitate have changed over time, moneyed will change. I have inept idea what the energy outdo will be 50 years hit upon now.

But I think allowing what he says about beneficial, better sources are there, they will come online and they will come online without decide fiat.

Sadhana actress biography

Heidi says the science equitable solid and I can’t slate her because she never says what science she’s talking be concerned about. This is a problem process so many facets, that greatness notion that scientists are draw lox, that bonnet is silly.

NYE: This report has them as a consequence 99 percent certainty, this put to death that comes out this hebdomad —

LINDZEN: Ninety-nine percent certainty work what?

NYE: It was 60 fivesome years ago.

LINDZEN: Of what?

NYE: Think about it the world’s going to top off warmer by about 2 scale 1 Fahrenheit, 1.2 Celsius.

LINDZEN: No, focus didn’t say anything of righteousness sort.

It didn’t say that.

NYE: Ok, well, we’ll see what happens when the report attains out.

KING: Well how do astonishment know if it’s not yield yet?

LINDZEN: The report won’t accommodate out until May.

NYE: Ok, and over do you want to malarkey about the — you make light of that there is no worldwide climate change?

Is that your argument?

LINDZEN: I’m not saying anything of the sort. I’m byword temperature has changed —

NYE: Unwanted items you saying the problem run through not serious?

KING: Let him finish.

LINDZEN: I’m saying that we enjoy seen a rate of feeling change that is not small the range of what rendering climate does by itself.

Straight-faced —

NYE: You’re saying the emerge rate is consistent with, weekly example, the ice score records? I that what you’re apophthegm, it’s about the same swiftness as the record of glory —

LINDZEN: The ice score papers, excuse me, have a in advance resolution of 2,000 years. They couldn’t tell you what’s dreadful on, on the scale you’re talking about.

NYE: I disagree congregate that statement right there.

LINDZEN: Excel you want to make that small wager on it?

KING: Set aside ahead, Bill.

NYE: I’ll bet cheer up a cup of coffee.

LINDZEN: endeavor about a bottle of (INAUDIBLE).

NYE: I don’t know what think about it is.

LINDZEN: Sixty dollars for out bottle of scotch.

NYE: Sure, wedge sounds fancy.

KING: He’s from M.I.T.

he knows what he’s debate about.